Still a lot of people don’t like to hear or read about assertions that the Covid Pfizer/Moderna mRNA vaccine that’s not a vaccine actually doesn’t, and wasn’t intended to, prevent infections or spreading of the virus, and is in fact harming and killing a lot of people.
So, I wanted to repost here my post from last September explaining how the mRNA drug injection is not a real vaccine, is just another pharmaceutical drug and is only intended to reduce symptoms in the person who has received the injection, and has nothing to do with protecting other people from being infected with the virus.
Many people now refer to “getting vaccinated,” with the common implication that such “vaccination” from Pfizer or Moderna gives people immunity from Covid-19, and prevents transmission of the virus.
“Being vaccinated protects you from me,” or “protects me from you,” is what is being stated or implied. But that’s just not true.
First, the Pfizer/Moderna mRNA “vaccine” does not prevent infection or transmission of the virus, and was not intended to. The mRNA drug injection’s purpose and intention is to reduce symptoms. It is only intended to benefit the one being injected.
With the Pfizer/Moderna mRNA drug injection, there is no prevention of transmission or stopping of a contagious virus.
So, why are so many employers, schools, businesses and venues mandating “being vaccinated” and that people show “proof of vaccination” if it’s based on what is really just a myth?
Hmm, that’s a good question. (Because we now live in a 21st Century “Twilight Zone”? Ya think?)
So, while it seems that most people are repeating the lie unwittingly and ignorantly, there are people repeating the lie knowingly and intentionally and misleading the public, including, in my view, the people at Pfizer and Moderna, and the CDC and NIH. They HAVE to know the truth!
Medical and “public health” officials have no real way of even distinguishing the “Delta” variant from other variants of the Covid virus, as Jon Rappoport points out.
And the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA drug injections are not preventing infections or transmission, so instead of admitting that these drugs aren’t even intended to do that, officials such as the CDC director are saying that people will need to have a third booster shot. (And then a fourth, and a fifth, etc., etc.)
Those “vaccines” intended to reduce symptoms are really just pharmaceutical drugs for people who actually have symptoms. So, with mandates and passports, what is being mandated is that people have a pharmaceutical drug injected into their bodies, coercively, whether they are sick or not.
However, as the Johnson & Johnson Covid vaccine actually is a traditional vaccine, and is approximately 60% effective, it causes blood clots. Wait, so do the mRNA vaccines! What is the point?
In addition to that information, Laurence Vance totally dismantles the main arguments to get a Covid “vaccine,” especially by pointing out the hundreds of thousands of reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, and the validity of the VAERS itself.
But the Covid propaganda, lies and fear-mongering just seem to never stop. This all started in or around January of 2020, and now it’s September of 2021. Alas, it looks like it will never end.
In September 2021 we now have a religious revival in Covidiocy, a.k.a. “surge,” with “more cases” and “increased hospitalizations” and so forth. And we now hear another repeated lie, that it’s a “pandemic of the unvaccinated,” when the truth is a high percentage of those in the hospital for Covid have been partially or fully “vaccinated.” And the truth is, it is the vaccinated who are actually more of a threat to the unvaccinated!
But I wanted to address the Pfizer/Moderna mRNA “vaccine” issue here.
Now, I have referred to the mRNA “vaccines” as not actual vaccines, that weren’t intended to prevent infection or transmission but are in fact intended to reduce symptoms.
So, those “vaccines” cannot legitimately be called “vaccines,” and in fact the companies and government agencies claiming them to be such are committing fraud.
And the Pfizer/Moderna “vaccines” really are “gene therapy,” like a form of chemotherapy. When I’m googling mRNA vaccines and “gene therapy,” I see many websites such as Reuters, WebMD, and Forbes spinning and falsely asserting that the mRNA “vaccines” are NOT gene therapy.
Joseph Mercola has taken on this issue several times now. He says there’s no way around the mRNA drug injections being gene therapy, and not vaccines. But it appears that sources such as Merriam-Webster are partaking in the aforementioned spin. Mercola writes:
We should not be fooled by attempts to condition the public to accept redefined terms. As of February 2019, Merriam-Webster defined “vaccine” as “a preparation of killed microorganisms, living attenuated organisms, or living fully virulent organisms that is administered to produce or artificially increase immunity to a particular disease.” By February 26, 2021, they had updated the definition of “vaccine” to:
“A preparation that is administered (as by injection) to stimulate the body’s immune response against a specific infectious disease:
“a: an antigenic preparation of a typically inactivated or attenuated … pathogenic agent (such as a bacterium or virus) or one of its components or products (such as a protein or toxin)
“b: a preparation of genetic material (such as a strand of synthesized messenger RNA) that is used by the cells of the body to produce an antigenic substance (such as a fragment of virus spike protein)”
Mercola quotes from the American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy, from Moderna’s own trial website and from Wired magazine on how these Pfizer and Moderna “gene therapy” medical treatments work.
And Mercola quoted the MIT Technology Review, regarding Moderna’s development of mRNA technology:
“Vaccines were not their focus. At the company’s founding in 2010, its leaders imagined they might be able to use RNA to replace the injected proteins that make up most of the biotech pharmacopoeia, essentially producing drugs inside the patient’s own cells from an RNA blueprint. ‘We were asking, could we turn a human into a bioreactor?’ says Noubar Afeyan, the company’s cofounder …”
Hmm, that sounds like something I want injected into MY body, for sure.
Especially for a virus that has a 99.98% survival rate, and in which at least half of the people who have the virus have no symptoms. And we know that “asymptomatic carriers” do not spread the virus, according to an earlier Dr. Fauci himself and the W.H.O.
So the whole thing with lockdowns, business and school closures, masks and “vaccines” is a total scam!
Back to Mercola. In that important article Mercola cites Moderna’s SEC filings, regarding the description of the mRNA “vaccine” as “gene therapy.” The Moderna SEC filing states, according to Mercola, that, “Currently, mRNA is considered a gene therapy product by the FDA.”
And I searched the Moderna SEC filing document for that sentence. Here is what Moderna states:
Currently, mRNA is considered a gene therapy product by the FDA. Unlike certain gene therapies that irreversibly alter cell DNA and could act as a source of side effects, mRNA-based medicines are designed to not irreversibly change cell DNA; however, side effects observed in gene therapy could negatively impact the perception of mRNA medicines despite the differences in mechanism. In addition, because no product in which mRNA is the primary active ingredient has been approved, the regulatory pathway for approval is uncertain…
Hmm, they sure do project a lot of confidence in their mRNA product here, don’t they? Of course such a drug injection should be mandated on people! Who in his right mind would object to that?
And the statement says that “mRNA-based medicines are designed to not irreversibly change cell DNA,” [emphasis mine] but Moderna doesn’t guarantee otherwise.
Then there’s the “however,” followed by “side effects observed in gene therapy could negatively impact the perception of mRNA medicines…”
The “perception”? Like after the tens of thousands of deaths and hundreds of thousands of other adverse reactions from the mRNA “vaccine,” we might perceive it to be negative? Okay.
And in that Moderna SEC filing I searched for words like “prevents infection” or “prevention of infection,” or “prevents transmission,” etc. And there were no such references throughout the roughly 86,000-word document.
Mercola points out:
So, to summarize: The definition of “genetic” is something relating to genes, and the definition of “therapy” is the medical treatment of a disease. The definition of “gene therapy” is the process of modifying or manipulating the expression of a gene, or altering the biological properties of living cells.
mRNA are snippets of genetic code that instructs cells to produce proteins. mRNA COVID-19 therapies “deliver genetic instructions into your cells,” thereby triggering your body to produce a fragment of the virus (the spike protein). So, mRNA vaccines ARE gene therapy. There’s simply no way around this. They fulfill all the definitions of gene therapy and none of the definitions for a vaccine.
What we are seeing here is a massive fraud scheme, in which pharmaceutical companies are selling their experimental drug injections, claiming them to be “vaccines” and falsely claiming they will prevent Covid-19 virus infection and prevent transmission of the virus, claims and assertions that are being repeated by government officials, their “news” media stenographers, business leaders and others.
“The Unvaccinated” are being labeled selfish and terrible people and being discriminated against socially and even financially. It has now become a fanatical crusade based on misinformation, lies and propaganda.
And for what? For pharmaceutical companies to make a lot of money at U.S. taxpayer expense? This is total fraud.
Where is Rand Paul on this? He’s been good with his criticism of the harmful, oxygen-depriving sickness-causing masks, and pointing out the importance of natural immunity. But I heard Sen. Paul on the Sean Hannity radio show discussing those issues and it sounded like Paul was promoting and certainly not criticizing the “vaccines.” Is Sen. Paul afraid of the pharmaceutical companies?
And I haven’t heard Sen. Paul point out that the people administering or analyzing the PCR tests have been using high cycle threshold numbers which guarantees false positive results, and turning the numbers back down (such as in January after the W.H.O. advised that people do that, an advisory just hours after Biden was inaugurated, of course).
The problem with the PCR tests goes beyond just overly high cycle thresholds.
Does Sen. Paul know about the “casedemic” based on redefining a “case” as anyone who tests positive rather than a “case” being someone who is actually sick with symptoms? There has been another “surge in cases.” (But most of them are probably not sick.)
What about the CDC guidelines on turning the cycle threshold numbers lower to weed out false positives but only for “vaccinated” people, but leaving the numbers higher for the “unvaccinated”? I’ll bet the general population doesn’t really know that this fraud is being done. If I had any influence that U.S. senators have I’d be shouting all this by the rooftops.
If Sen. Paul is or seems to be the only one in Washington publicly arguing with Fauci and other bureaucrats on the masks, the virus itself and funding for viral research, why isn’t he bringing up the “vaccine” fraud, like calling in the CEOs of Moderna and Pfizer and getting them to admit under oath that their “vaccines” are “gene therapy” and thus are medical treatments and aren’t intended to prevent transmission of viruses?
And further, regarding the latest Covid Delta “surge,” hospital staff are testing everyone who is in the hospital, so what they have are many people already in the hospital for other reasons but falsely testing positive for the virus.
“Hospitals are inundated with Covid patients,” but mainly because many hospitals’ nursing and other medical staff are voluntarily quitting or being fired for refusing the “vaccine”! (Because they might know things most of us don’t? Ya think?)
Still, we’re talking about a cold/flu with a 99.98% survival rate, and those dying from Covid are mainly already very sick elderly people and obese people with other comorbidities.
Why so much hysteria for a virus with a 99.98% survival rate?
Rather than dangerous and risky “vaccines,” especially for people who are healthy and are not at risk from a Covid virus, taking vitamin D and zinc is better and much less dangerous for prevention. (See Our greatest weapon against the coronavirus is Vitamin D: Board-certified pathologist, Boston University study finds Vitamin D reduces COVID-19 risk, Vitamin D levels appear to play role in COVID-19 mortality rates. Patients with severe deficiency are twice as likely to experience major complications, Vitamin D deficiency may raise risk of getting COVID-19, study finds, More Than 80% of COVID Patients Are Vitamin D Deficient, Covid-19: Poor outcomes in patients with zinc deficiency, and The Potential Impact of Zinc Supplementation on COVID-19 Pathogenesis for some info.)
And plenty of studies now have been confirming that people with natural immunity, that is, people who have had Covid-19 and developed immunity, are much less likely to have Covid with symptoms than those who have had these “vaccines.” As Mercola has asked, why don’t we hear about natural immunity from our “public health” gurus?