The Testing Part of the Covid Scam: High Cycle Threshold and False Positives

In a recent post on the Covid scam I wrote about the myth of “asymptomatic carriers being contagious” and how that was not true but the whole scheme of lockdowns, stay-in orders, etc. was based on that false assertion.

Now I will review the testing part of the scam. This is all still going on. People are still sticking swabs up their nostrils, wearing self-suffocation muzzles and gags, and getting drug injections for no good reason.

So, the Covid scam was based largely on people testing positive for Covid-19, with the testers using overly high cycle threshold numbers on the PCR tests to get people to falsely test positive, cause panic and hysteria over a cold/flu, and make healthy people have to quarantine and stay away from other healthy people.

This November 2020 article on Just the News explains the PCR test cycle threshold issue:

At issue is the method by which many COVID-19 tests detect a patient’s viral load within a given sample. Polymerase chain reaction tests, which have been widely deployed to determine if individuals are infected with the disease, function by amplifying DNA samples to the point that an antigen can be detected and classified. 

The “cycle threshold” is the number of amplification cycles a PCR test goes through before a target pathogen is detected. A lower cycle threshold means that a higher amount of the virus was present in the sample; a higher threshold means the machine had to work harder to detect the virus in the sample, indicating a lower viral load and more likely a non-infectious patient. 

According to a rundown of PCR tests compiled by the Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, many manufacturers of PCR tests set the cycle threshold cutoff for a positive sample at up to around 40 cycles, a level numerous public health officials believe is guaranteed to return what are effectively false positive results that have detected fragments of the virus.

“I’m shocked that people would think that 40 could represent a positive,” Juliet Morrison, a virology professor at the University of California, Riverside, told the New York Times in August.

This article on PJ Media explains the situation more broadly.

But Zero Hedge then had an article in January 2021 on the corrupt nature of the abuse of PCR tests overly-high cycle thresholds, an article which was reprinted on this Principia Scientific International page.

The article notes that on the same day that Biden was inaugurated on January 20, 2021, the W.H.O. released a statement recognizing the fact that PCR tests at higher cycle threshold would likely cause false positives and that the cycle thresholds should be much lower for accuracy. W.H.O. released this a whole year after the Covid scam had been imposed.

“Doctor” Fauci even stated that cycle threshold above 35 guarantee false positive results!

As Jon Rappoport wrote:

July 16, 2020, podcast, “This Week in Virology”: Tony Fauci makes a point of saying the PCR COVID test is useless and misleading when the test is run at “35 cycles or higher.” A positive result, indicating infection, cannot be accepted or believed.

Here, in techno-speak, is an excerpt from Fauci’s key quote (starting at about the 4-minute mark…):

“…If you get [perform the test at] a cycle threshold of 35 or more…the chances of it being replication-confident [aka accurate] are miniscule…you almost never can culture virus [detect a true positive result] from a 37 threshold cycle…even 36…”

Each “cycle” of the test is a quantum leap in amplification and magnification of the test specimen taken from the patient.

Too many cycles, and the test will turn up all sorts of irrelevant material that will be wrongly interpreted as relevant.

That’s called a false positive.

What Fauci failed to say on the video is: the FDA, which authorizes the test for public use, recommends the test should be run up to 40 cycles. Not 35.

Therefore, all labs in the US that follow the FDA guideline are knowingly or unknowingly participating in fraud.

Another fraud that officials such as CDC and states’ “public health” bureaucrats have been committing for 2+ years has been the redefining of “cases,” in which, while a “case” used to be someone who was actually sick and had symptoms, now a “case” is anyone who tests positive for the virus regardless of having any symptoms, and despite the inaccuracy of the tests at higher cycle thresholds.

Not only has the testing been inaccurate and fraudulent, but dangerous, in my view, as far as the nasal swab tests are concerned.

Thus with a virus that had a one-tenth to two-tenths of one percent infection fatality rate (similar to that of seasonal flu), and due to CDC guidelines counting non-Covid deaths as “Covid deaths,” we had people who really died of the disease they were already dying of, heart disease, kidney disease etc., but being counted as a “Covid death” simply because they (falsely) tested positive for the virus.

So, we have had a Covid scamdemic for 2+ years, based on bogus testing (and intentionally so, in my view) and a redefinition of “cases,” and exaggeration of the death counts and the CDC’s changed guidelines as to what constitutes a “Covid death” (which I will get to more thoroughly shortly).

Create your website with WordPress.com
Get started
%d bloggers like this: