More News and Commentary

Laurie Calhoun: Minimizing Risk and Maximizing Lethality: This Is Your Security Force

James Bovard: Supreme Court Tortures the Constitution Again

John Whitehead: Everything Is a Weapon: The U.S. Government Is Waging Psychological Warfare on the Nation

Paul Sperry: FBI Chief Comey Misled Congress’s “Gang of 8” Over Russiagate, Lisa Page Memo Reveals

Ray McGovern: Did Obama Know ‘Russian Hacking’ Was a Fraud?

Dylan Charles: The 4 Tiers of Authoritarian Behavioral Control and The Value of Your Unique Mind

Walker Larson: The Five Stages of Totalitarianism

Children’s Health Defense: 1,287,595 Injuries Reported After Covid Shots, Vaccine Injury Compensation Programs “Overwhelmed”

Joseph Mercola: Pediatrician: Data Is ‘Irrefutable’ — Covid Vaccines Are Dangerous for Kids

Jon Rappoport: Another Covid Vaccine Smoking Gun

Brendan Brown: Even When There Is Inflation, the Fed STILL Fights Falling Prices

Lew Rockwell: The Broken Window Fallacy Reapplied

Glenn Greenwald: Joe Biden’s Submissive — and Highly Revealing — Embrace of Saudi Despots

Natural News: Healthy Young People Now Dying en Masse across Australia, And the Corporate Media Still Won’t Dare Mention Vaccines

And Laurence Vance: Libertarian Lessons from the Super Bowl

Important Articles

Jonathan Turley: Freedom is Tyranny: Robert Reich Goes Full Orwellian in Anti-Free Speech Screed

Robert Batemarco: Sovereign Immunity Is Antilaw: The State Must Make Restitution to Its Victims

Joseph Mercola: FDA and Pfizer Knew Covid Shot Caused Immunosuppression

Ryan McMaken: New Covid Study Shows Lockdown-Heavy States Had Some of the Worst Health Results

David D’Amato: World Leaders Must Turn Away From Nuclear Arms

TJ Martinell: Ukraine War Shows How Far U.S. Has Strayed from George Washington’s Foreign Policy

Jacob Hornberger: The Biggest Threat to Our Freedom and Well-Being

Michelle Malkin: Pedophiles, Perversity and Groomers in Plain Sight

Stephan Kinsella: Hans-Hermann Hoppe on SERVUS TV: On State, War, Europe, Decentralization and Neutrality

Ted Galen Carpenter: McCarthyism Re‐​Emerging Stronger than Ever in Ukraine Policy Debates

Tess Lawrie: WHO Global Pandemic Agreement Would Supersede Individual Nations’ Constitutions

Laurence Vance: Republicans Miss the Real Issue Regarding TSA Scanners

Citrix News: The Whitmer Case & the FBI’s PATCON Legacy

Glenn Greenwald: Western Dissent from U.S./NATO Policy on Ukraine Is Small, Yet the Censorship Campaign Is Extreme

Jack Hellner: Earth Day Is Coming Up. It Is a Good Time to Remind the Public What the Predictions Were 52 Years Ago

Steve Kirsch: The More You Vax, the Weaker Your Immune System Becomes

And Gateway Pundit: Man Who Discovered Ballot Trafficking Operation In Yuma County Handed Evidence To AG Brnovich BEFORE 2020 General Election: “They Could Have Stopped This.”

The U.S. Constitution and the National Security State

Jacob Hornberger has some points to ponder on the U.S. Constitution. He notes that the Constitution authorizes the federal government to have specific enumerated, limited government powers, not omnipotent powers, and not a national security state. And he then discusses the Bill of Rights and how after World War II especially it all went downhill from there because of the rulers’ turning the nation into a national security state.

In my view, there shouldn’t be a federal government to begin with, and the people of this society need to decentralize and dismantle the federal government. But, if there must be a government (any government, federal, state or local), then we should keep the Bill of Rights as the law which all government agents must follow. The Bill of Rights is a small listing of some of the rights that all people have inherently, and it provides rules requiring government agents to not infringe on those rights of the people. So, that’s my view on that.

Here is an excerpt from Hornberger’s article

If Americans are to regain a free, prosperous, harmonious, moral, normal, and peaceful society, their focus must not be on Russia, China, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, terrorism, communism, Islam, or any other supposed threat. Their focus must necessarily be on the entity that has destroyed their rights, liberties, and well-being, and that is currently pushing them closer to nuclear devastation, not to mention national bankruptcy — the national-security state that was unconstitutionally and illegally brought into existence to fight its Cold War racket.

How could anyone out there disagree with that?

Libertarianism Is the Best Alternative to the Democrats and Republicans

Laurence Vance at the Future of Freedom Foundation presents the “Libertarian Brand,” clarifying some confusion about libertarianism that many people unfortunately have. Not necessarily the Libertarian Party but libertarianism in general. This terrific article also includes summaries of the Democrat and Republican parties and their brands, and why libertarianism is the way to have a free society.

Violating Their Constitutional Oaths: Police Running Rape Victims’ DNA Through Criminal Databases

This article on Tech Dirt says that San Francisco’s fuzz have been running rape victims’ DNA through databases to actually do criminal background checks on them. Can you believe this?

I mean, it’s difficult enough to encourage a victim of horrible sexual assault to report the crime. But then treating the victim as a suspect, not even in any particular crime that has occurred (other than the crime committed against her) but the police going on a fishing expedition against a victim of a crime that actually did occur!

Government police are supposed to obey the law like the rest of us. They swore an oath to obey the U.S. Constitution as well as their state constitutions, in addition to their officer’s oath, which I referred to recently.

So the U.S. Constitution — which contains the Bill of Rights — is the law of the land. Officers have to follow the rules of the Fourth and Fifth Amendments specifically. The Fourth says you must have reasonable suspicion and probable cause to do any kind of search or seizure, and the Fifth guarantees the accused of due process.

But there needs to be a crime actually committed to then have any reason to suspect someone of something, so that forbids police from taking someone’s DNA without suspicion and going off on a fishing expedition when the individual whose DNA has been taken has not even been accused of a crime. In this case the DNA victim is reporting a crime as a victim! Duh, fuzz. Stop acting like Nazis.

Remove Ballot Access Restrictions

Jacob Hornberger has a post on establishment politicians and bureaucrats (i.e. Democrats and Republicans) blocking ballot access for non-establishment (i.e. non-Democrat and non-Republican), third-party or independent candidates. I agree with him on removing the restrictions. There’s no valid reason for those restrictions. In my view, people have a right to have their name on a ballot if they want to run for public office. While Hornberger doesn’t address this, I think such a right is protected by the First Amendment.

Old Post on “Common Core Police State”

I was recently reminded of this post I did in September of 2013 and that I reposted one other time. There have been several things recently that reminded me of this post. So, I will repost it again.

Obama’s “Common Core”: Part of the Increasing Police State of Amerika

September 22, 2013

I recently brought up some very crazy events at some schools which were a part of Obama’s educational diktats, known as Common Core. This is very nutty stuff, it’s beyond merely “irrational.”

And now, as Activist Post reports, a meeting with Maryland school teachers and administrators on Common Core included a Q&A session for parents and PTA members. However, the questions were to be submitted to the controllers in advance, much like the Presidential debate controllers do when they take questions from audience members. Alas, just as with the political party debate controllers, the school meeting controllers went on to pick and choose which questions to read or answer and which to omit.

One problem had been with the Maryland schools’ administrators intentionally not informing parents of the Common Core curriculum for three whole years since they decided to implement it. Many parents had legitimate questions, including how information about students will be collected and where it will be stored, and whether there is a way for parents to opt out.

The question as to whether parents can opt out was not answered. What a shocking development.

Of course you can’t opt out! This is public schools, after all! (In case you didn’t know, in modern Amerikan dialect, “public” really means “fascist.”)

And at that meeting which consisted of about 160 people including the Baltimore County Superintendent who censored out the tough questions, another parent with a question (which was not answered) decided to stand up and ask his question anyway. He was cordially escorted out by a government-employed police thug, no big surprise there.

According to Activist Post,

One parent, Robert Small, very respectfully tried to voice his concerns and was shut out from participating when a policeman forcefully removed him from the auditorium.

“I want to know how many parents here are aware that the goal of the Common Core standards isn’t to prepare kids for full-fledged universities, it’s to prepare them for community college,” explained Small before he was approached by security.

Small went on to warn the residents that they have a right to a proper debate on what’s best for their own community and they shouldn’t be dictated to by bureaucrats.

“Parents, take control. We’re sick of this. This is not a CNN political game. This is a public town hall … Listen, don’t stand for this. You’re sitting here like cattle. You have questions. Confront them. They don’t want to do it in public … Parents, you need to question these people…Do the research, it’s online.”

Mr. Small went on to ask about Common Core’s apparent goal of “lowering educational standards.” While he was being made to leave by a goon with “Security” on his shirt, a lady in the audience pointed out that the controllers were reading only the “softball” questions, which they obviously were.

Here via Activist Post is the video of that:

You see, the bureaucrats who rule over us do not like it when their diktats are challenged, and when their precious little fiefdoms are disturbed in any way. They do not like it when the emperor is revealed to have no clothes or when Toto pulls the curtain away from the “Wizard.” Especially when we have a One-Party State ruled by Emperor Obama with all his little minions and flunkies carrying out his Soviet-like orders. In this case of Common Core, the orders are to “lower educational standards,” to make 3 x 4 = 11, and to teach the kids that “Obama is good,” but liberty is bad.

With the above video, I was reminded of another video of the Internet-famous lady at the Quartzsite, Arizona City Council meeting who was attempting to bring up the questionable rules that were made but never voted on by the Council, and a questionable tax as well, before she was cordially escorted out of the meeting room by police goons.

And here is that video:

I think these sorts of things will be happening more and more now, particularly involving meetings which will discuss the collapsing of Supreme Court rubber-stamped ObamaCareless. In contrast, many town hall meetings back in 2009 and 2010 seemed to be cordial and polite (except for this one, though), with the people being allowed to exercise their right to peacefully assemble, their right to speak and their right to “petition the Government for a redress of grievances,” as the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution clearly states.

But, as Amerika continues its descent into chaos and turmoil, under the increasing tyranny of dictators and all the little wannabe dictators of local school committees and city councils, we will see less and less civility, mainly on the part of those who are employed by the government, while the civilians who want to “petition the Government for a redress of grievances” will have themselves forcibly removed from meetings and protests.

As Arthur Silber noted just recently, most people go along with the group, no matter how wrong the group is morally or practically, because they were raised to go along as a means of getting approval from others. The ones who merely go along with the group even when the group is wrong are cowards, obviously.

So, as Amerika descends, the majority who love the Rulers and who depend on the Rulers for handouts, from the welfare and food stamp people to the military contractors and their defenders in the government media, will stifle those who defend themselves from government’s intrusions, from police abuse, and who believe in freedom of choice in health care and who believe in the rule of law.

I will not get into the other areas in which we have seen police acting unlawfully and criminally. However, the most recent example was a September 17th protest of Gen David Petraeus, the schmoozing Presidential wannabe, at CUNY in New York City, the city that never thinks. Police charged protesters from the sidewalk onto the street so police could have the excuse to unlawfully arrest at least 6 protesters. In this video provided by the U.K. Guardian, one protester who was already on the ground and totally restrained (and obviously not a threat) was repeatedly punched in the ribs by a cowardly cop. Naturally, the coward here will not be arrested and probably not even fired or disciplined in any serious way.

I have addressed the issue of why civilians should be armed and the government should not be armed here, and more recently here (although I may not have put it in such a way in those two posts). And Judge Andrew Napolitano has addressed related issues here.

Now for those police or otherwise government-employed armed security out there, when things get bad especially when there is economic collapse, and Emperor Obama orders some kind of overt martial law (on top of the already existing unofficial martial law we have now), whose side will you be on? Will you take the defense of the people and their freedom? Or will you obey Obama’s (and governors’) unlawful orders to arrest or detain innocent people who are merely exercising their rights to freedom of speech and self-defense? Will you unlawfully and unconstitutionally confiscate guns? Computers? Laptops? Hmmm?

However, you “LEOs” out there have sworn an oath to obey the Constitution which is the law of the land. It is certainly imperfect, but an important part of it is the Bill of Rights. And morally, ethically, and legally you are more obligated to obey the law than you are obligated to obey commanding officers including the President, especially when they give unlawful orders. I addressed that issue here in my article on martial law.

For instance, regarding the security goon there in the first video of the Common Core meeting, government-employed (and taxpayer-funded) security should have protected the parent’s right to speak and his right to “petition the Government for a redress of grievances,” and to get his questions answered by the panel there. Instead, in the name of “order” or “following the rules of the event” (i.e. only allowing softball questions to be answered), the government-employed and taxpayer-funded security employee enforced the bureaucrats’ censorship of parents who have major issues with this Common Core Crapola.

The purpose of Common Core is not only to lower educational standards, but to continue and further strengthen the 150-year-old tradition of government schools indoctrinating the kids to be obedient serfs and to not question the Rulers. When you dumb the people down, you also are discouraging them to think critically. Anyone who actually thinks critically would probably not approve of a government-controlled education scheme, a government-controlled medical care scheme, or a government-monopolized police system which have all become self-serving bureaucracies of incompetents, power-grabbers, and Nazi-wannabes. I realize some people disagree with me on that, but that has been my conclusion for some time now.

Ron Paul’s book on homeschooling, The School Revolution: A New Answer for Our Broken Education System couldn’t have come at a better time. And it is informative even for those who do not homeschool their kids.

To close, here are some uplifting videos, certainly more uplifting than those posted above. The first one is attorney KrisAnne Hall of the Tenth Amendment Center (I think the discussion was on gun control.):

And this other video includes KrisAnne Hall, with further remarks by Stephani Scruggs:

More News and Commentary

Becky Akers: Fauxchi’s Fall

Brian Joondeph: Stockholm Syndrome over Mask Wearing.

Megan Redshaw: ‘We Made a Big Mistake’ — Covid Vaccine Spike Protein Travels From Injection Site, Can Cause Organ Damage.

Katie Herzog: What Happens When Doctors Can’t Tell the Truth?

Thomas Knapp: A Convention of States Wouldn’t Fix the U.S. Constitution.

Glenn Greenwald: The FBI’s Strange Anthrax Investigation Sheds Light on Covid Lab-Leak Theory and Fauci’s Emails.

Brett Wilkins: Biden Joins Long Line of Presidents to ‘Woefully’ Undercount Civilians Killed in US Wars.

Craig Murray: Twisting U.K. Law To Criminalize Dissent on Palestine.

Jon Schwarz: Why Daniel Ellsberg Wants the U.S. to Prosecute Him under the Espionage Act.

Lew Rockwell: Myths of the Mixed Economy

Jeff Deist: A Libertarian Approach to Disputed Land Titles

Project Veritas: New Insider Tape Revealing Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg and Heidi Swartz Punish Truth Seekers, Censor ‘Actually True Events or Facts’

Victor Davis Hanson: The New Regressive Dark Ages.

And The Last Refuge: Behind The SARS-CoV-2 Origination Backstory All Roads Lead to Stop Trump

Instead of “Packing the Supreme Court,” Let’s UNpack the Supreme Court

OMG, Schumer, Nadler and Markey want to “pack the Supreme Court,” by adding 4 more Democrat “Justices” to the existing 9 Supreme Bureaucrats. They want to do this because they really believe that the current Court has a 6-3 “conservative” majority! Yes, they really believe that.

The reason that the Sheeplecrats want to “pack the Supreme Court” is because they are too impatient to wait for a “Justice” to retire (or die) and be replaced by one that’s more to their liking.

So they impatiently drool to ram their dictatorial mandates and tax-thefts down the throats of the people more quickly by getting a faux “Supreme” Court to rubber-stamp their agenda. And with HR 1 all future elections will belong to them, these thieves, cheaters, fraudsters, hooligans, barbarians and shysters.

And it isn’t just Democrats who are the criminals and thieves and extortionists, the Republicans are bad, too. (See Laurence Vance’s articles exposing the conservatives and Republicans‘ corruption, ignorance and hypocrisy, for example, when it comes to their proclaiming to promote “limited government,” “free markets” and “liberty.” i.e. they’re FOS just as much as the Democrats and “liberals.”)

No, rather than packing the Supreme Commissars, I say, let’s UNpack them, by just getting rid of the whole thing. They really suck, when you get right down to it.

The 9 robed goons are unreliable, unsupportive of the Constitution, incapable of defending liberty, and they are just all around nothing more than Soviet-like apparatchiks, quite frankly.

The truth is, what we have at the top of the U.S. so-called judicial system is a Supreme Swamp, because that is exactly what those “Justices” are, just another part of the Swamp in Washington.

The Supreme Court rarely comes to the side of the rights of the individual and private property against the threats and aggressions of the government and police.

For example, while some of the current “Justices” were not there 10 years ago, at that time the High Swamp high-fived the jailing and strip searching of arrestees who were abducted for non-arrestable offenses, such as walking a dog sans leash or for unpaid parking tickets.

The Republican appointees were the ones who voted to approve such criminal treatment of presumably innocent folks. Hence, “Rethuglicans.”

But “liberals” are also useless when it comes to civil liberties. Also around that time the Court rubber-stamped the government’s drug gestapo breaking into people’s home, terrorizing them and abducting them because police smelled marijuana and heard a toilet flushing, implying people were “destroying evidence,” even though such evidence was not that of an actual crime with an actual victim.

And obviously with an 8-1 decision, several of the “liberals” on the High Swamp agreed with the usual conservative authoritarian neanderthals, that the drug war police state is so important that we must allow government police to criminally and violently break into a home and terrorize and abduct innocent people for ingesting non-approved drugs. “Liberals” Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Stephen Breyer joined the “conservative” neanderthals in this one, with Ruth Bader Ginsburg actually citing that dusty ol’ Fourth Amendment in her lone dissent.

Sorry, morons, the real and only legitimate ruling to that case is to rule the entire drug war unconstitutional, because the government involving itself in drugs is not authorized by the U.S. Constitution. And, does the individual own one’s own life and body or does the government own one’s life and body? Duh, Elena, Sonia, Clarence, et al.

The 9 robed Swamp Supremes are loathsome and corrupt, and are the lap dogs for the fascists in the White House and the communists in CONgress, and they are useless. Bought and paid for, or otherwise bribed to do the fascists bidding as well as being obedient State-worshiping ignoramuses, that is what these people are.

Chief “Justice” (sic) John Roberts suddenly switched his vote of ruling the ObamaCare law unconstitutional to his joining the Obama apparatchiks to approve the ObamaCare law and the individual mandate. Was Roberts threatened, or blackmailed? NSA whistleblower Russ Tice told how NSA abuses made high public officials susceptible to blackmail, and other NSA whistleblowers including Edward Snowden and William Binney backed those assertions.

They will be even worse now when they see government officials and juries deciding cases out of fear of being attacked by social activist thugs engaged in “peaceful” protests, and out of fear of their homes being burned to the ground.

And the Supreme Sheeple then approved ObamaCare a second time in 2015, and its subsidies, further empowering the criminal IRS. “The Affordable Care Act is here to stay,” said Barack Obomber, reinforced later by traitor John McCain who voted against repealing it.

The High Supreme Swamp also ruled against the Fifth Amendment in its Kelo decision to allow local governments to steal private property away from the owner and redistribute it over to other private citizens for financial profits. That was a no-brainer, but John Paul Stevens, Anthony Kennedy, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, David Souter, and the only remaining one of them left now Stephen Breyer thought otherwise.

And Scalia? An “Originalist”? Heh. Scalia of course sided with the drug war police state in the aforementioned decision, is questionable on the 2nd Amendment, rejected private property rights and self-ownership in favor of collectivist moral legislating, and obediently accepted the government’s bogus war on terror to justify violating the due process rights of detainees. (And, while he wasn’t endorsing internment camps, he even pointed out that internment camps à la World War II could return again in good ol’ USS of A.)

And Amy Coney Barrett? What a disappointment, even before she crawled up to the High Slimy Bench. In a lower court decision, Barrett sided with the other two fascists in her three-judge panel of the 7th Circus approving Gov. J.B. Pritzker (D-McDonald’s) unconstitutional Covid lockdown orders and limits on gatherings.

As I pointed out in an earlier blog, constitutionalist pastor Chuck Baldwin noted that based on her previous opinions Barrett will probably rubber-stamp the COVID police state and forced vaccines, and probably the surveillance state as well.

All these Supreme Court “Justices” (sic) defend the police state, the national security state, and seem to obediently believe the government’s false flags and fabrications to justify enslaving and imprisoning the population to “protect” them from the foreign bogey man, and from their own vices.

Brett Kavanaugh. Yech. Total authoritarian apparatchik police statist swamp creature. Included in lower court rulings Kavanaugh voted in favor of CIA covering up of the JFK assassination, and other national security state interests.

I wrote in an earlier blog on Kavanaugh’s deference to the national security state regarding the bulk collection of telephony metadata. This Cato article quotes Kavanaugh’s lower court opinion from 2015:

The Fourth Amendment allows governmental searches and seizures without individualized suspicion when the Government demonstrates a sufficient “special need” – that is, a need beyond the normal need for law enforcement – that outweighs the intrusion on individual liberty

The Fourth Amendment says nothing about there being a “special need” of government law enforcement that “outweighs” the right to be secure.

Does the Fourth Amendment say regarding our right to be secure, “except for a special need of law enforcement”? Nope.

Kavanaugh writes (with my comments inserted):

In my view, that critical national security need outweighs the impact on privacy occasioned by this program. The Government’s program does not capture the content of communications [Yes it does, with phone calls and emails as well!], but rather the time and duration of calls, and the numbers called.

Besides being ignorant of the feds’ ongoing criminal intrusions against innocent people, Kavanaugh also cites “drug testing of students, roadblocks to detect drunk drivers, border checkpoints, and security screening at airports” as examples of allowable violations of the Fourth Amendment.

In a different case, while the Court’s “liberals” in the majority voted to protect the right of the people and their cell phone data to not be tracked, the neanderthal “conservatives” who love the police state say, no, we think that gestapo Amerikan police goons must be permitted to track people’s cell phone data without a warrant, without reasonable suspicion, because we really don’t support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America and its Fourth Amendment, as we swore an oath to do. (And that case included Neil Gorsuch with the other conservatards who love the police state. So much for that guy.)

So, the Government Supremacists cite “exigent circumstances” when they know the gubmint goons are violating someone’s Fourth Amendment rights but they don’t care, such as in the case of permitting police to draw blood from an unconscious motorist who had already parked his van and was walking about. So, the Supreme Swampers themselves are goons and thugs, in my view. The Supreme Thugs is really what they are.

But back to Supreme Thug Brett Kavanaugh, in at least 3 “national security” (sic) cases Kavanaugh rubber-stamped the holding of terrorism suspects without charge or actual suspicion or evidence at the Guantanamo prison. (al-Bihani v. Obama, Uthman v. Obama, and Omar v. McHugh.) He might as well be an employee of the CIA. So, what if Gubmint suspected you conservatives of “insurrection” or “domestic terrorism,” for example, you want their goons abducting you without evidence or warrants and to be imprisoned indefinitely? You want that? Duh, conservatives.

Conservatives defended Kavanaugh in his nomination battle, but they don’t realize that Kavanaugh is a staunch “social justice” defender of Title IX. As he stated before the Senate Judiciary Committee, “Title IX helped make girls’ and women’s sports equal. And I see that law’s legacy every night when I walk into my house, as my daughters are getting back from lacrosse or basketball or hockey practice.” So obviously he is clueless as to the abuses of Title IX to enable false accusations of hapless males especially in college. Duh, “conservatives.”

Speaking of “social justice” (sic), the Supreme Swamp also shows what unprincipled gutless wonders they are in their attempting to defend a baker who refused to bake a cake for a gay wedding, but for the wrong reasons, a decision based on anything but the private property rights they should be upholding but seem to have no clue as to what that actually is.

And why didn’t the Supreme Bureaucrats overturn the “Defense of Marriage Act,” or any of the states’ impositions or state referendums on protecting or forbidding gay marriage? Why do legislatures or CONgress get themselves involved with the people’s private matters? As I wrote in this article, you own your own life and have a right to form whatever contracts with others you want, as long as it’s voluntary. Marriage is none of the State’s damn business!

The gutless Supreme Apparatchiks also showed how they view freedom of the Press by declining to hear journalist James Risen’s case on protecting a confidential source. They obediently and pathologically defend the national security state no matter what. But, they merely reflect the Amerikan True Believers. Oh, well.

And on freedom of speech, the “Justices” (sic) all oppose free speech when the other Party is the one being opposed, with socialism-dreaming “liberal” Elena Kagan possibly being the worst of them.

I’m sure the sheeple Democrats and Republicans would go running to the Supreme Nannies to get their permission on whether the people of the states can make use of the 10th Amendment to nullify federal edicts.

But, real Americans will nullify fascist orders and intrusions whether the Supreme Bureaucrats like it or not.

Tom Woods wrote a terrific book on the history of nullification in America and how it should be used currently:  Nullification: How to Resist Federal Tyranny in the 21st Century. Woods addresses objections to nullification on this page. (And see this, this, and this.)

I wish I could advocate “packing the Supreme Court” with libertarians and voluntaryists who believe in the non-aggression principle, private property rights, self-ownership, freedom of contract and freedom of association, but that’s not realistic.

No, the answer is to UNpack the Supreme Court and “throw the bums out,” along with the rest of the horrible central planning apparatus in criminal Washington. You bet.

Peggy Hall Discusses Covidiocy Restrictions with Sheriff Richard Mack

In this video Peggy Hall from The Healthy American talks to Sheriff Richard Mack of the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association. They discuss law enforcement officers’ oath to protect and defend the U.S. Constitution, sheriffs’ refusal to enforce Covid-related restrictions, face masks, and other important issues. Here is the BitChute page for that video.

Peggy Hall on Biden’s 100-Day Mask Diktat: Presidents Can’t Make a Law

Peggy Hall of The Healthy American discusses the unconstitutional Biden executive orders, and demonstrates why a President can’t make a law, and that executive orders are not laws. Only the legislative branch of government can make laws. She cites the U.S. Constitution, which IS the law of the land that Biden is supposed to follow. She also cites the White House’s website and Biden’s unconstitutional orders. The discussion is especially in regards to Biden’s federal “mask mandate,” which isn’t a mandate.

Video page on BitChute

Ron Paul: Government Unhinged, No Constitutional Restraints, Just Executive Orders!

Ron Paul and Chris Rossini discuss the Cheater-in-Thief Joe Biden’s illegal and unconstitutional executive orders.

From the YouTube page:

In just 9 days, President Biden has signed a record 40 executive orders, actions and directives. This is a far cry from the schoolbook instructions on “How a bill becomes a law.” Is this what “our democracy” has come to mean? The stroke of a pen? Where’s the U.S. Constitution?

News and Commentary

Zero Hedge: Right On Cue For Biden, WHO Admits High-Cycle PCR Tests Produce COVID False Positives.

Matt Agorist: Media Literally Compares Biden to God, Whitewashing New Face of US Police State & War Machine.

Caitlin Johnstone: Psycho Pompeo Exits With Nary A Scratch Of Media Criticism On Him.

John Whitehead: The Deep State’s Stealthy, Subversive, Silent Coup to Ensure Nothing Changes.

Jacob Hornberger: Woe to the Libertarian Non-Unifiers.

José Niño: Beware the Troop-Withdrawal Bait and Switch.

Robert Wenzel: This is Who Influences the Biden Team

Maryam Henein: The Storming Of The Capitol — Inciting Insurrection Or False Flag Attack?

Dave Lindorff: Time to Trash the Terrorist Watch List, a Police-State Frankenstein Gone Off the Rails.

Wendy McElroy: The Gold Clause: A Free-Market Gold Standard.

Ethan Yang: The Case for Decentralizing Monetary Policy.

And Alan Dershowitz: Congress Broke Two Records on Impeachment of Donald Trump.

Don’t Believe the Lying Lunatics of the “News” Media – Read These Instead

Glenn Greenwald: Violence in the Capitol, Dangers in the Aftermath.

Jacob Hornberger: There Is Still Time for Trump to Do the Right Thing.

Laurence Vance: The Real Constitutional Crisis.

Brendan O’Neill: Don’t Exaggerate the Threat of the Capitol Rioters.

Brian Shilhavy: “Very Healthy 56-Year-Old” Miami Obstetrician Dies after Being Injected with the Experimental Pfizer COVID Vaccine

Charles Burris: Escalation of the Strategy of Tension

And Gateway Pundit: Political Director Of ABC News Talks About ‘Cleansing’ America Of Trump Supporters.

Society Masked or Unmasked

I saw this video by Daniel Natal of The New American on this article by Yvonne Lorenzo on LRC. I think the video there is on BitChute but I can’t get embed HTML from that, but here is his YouTube version. Natal discusses the masks that many people are being forced to wear (even though these masks don’t prevent the transmission of viruses), and other kinds of mask wearing and why other people in other circumstances cover their identities with masks and face coverings.