We are now hearing more about the school shooting in Uvalde, Texas this week. It appears that the police waited outside the school while apparently the shooter was inside having barricaded himself in a classroom where he killed the little children.
Why wouldn’t the police go into the school building? Why did they have to form a “perimeter” outside? So, we know that they should have gone into the building at least in the hallway outside the classroom where the shooter was. Were they given an order to “stand down” by superiors? (Like the police in many of those 2020 BLM riots, looting, arson and burning down buildings, and other previous riots.)
And we are now hearing that parents who had rushed to the school were telling the police to go in, and some parents were trying to go in themselves to save their kids. I guess parents have more guts than government police when it comes to saving kids. One mother was able to get in and take her kid out to safety. Another parent, however, was TASERED by the government police and still other parents were actually handcuffed!
Talk about nazis. No wonder they call them “pigs.” Another good reason to abolish and de-monopolize government-monopolized community policing and security, as I wrote in this article.
And did you see some of the photos of the shooter? He had this kind of feminine-like sucking face, and a spooky resemblance to Elliot Rodger the Santa Barbara college shooter. I wrote about Rodger and Sandy Hook shooter Adam Lanza here and here. Yes, psychiatric drugs did play a role in those other shootings, as did video games (more the non-violent ones) and a general dysfunctional life. Oh, well.
And on talk radio, those “conservatives” are obsessed with police, with putting more police in the schools (or, as the nudnik Sean Hannity constantly says, “former police and military”). No, we don’t need ANY police in the schools! All they will do is arrest and handcuff little kids for “acting up” or for making a finger gesture like a gun and saying, “bang, bang!” and the government police otherwise assault the little kids. John Whitehead at the Rutherford Institute has written about those things many times now in his great articles.
No, rather than police, as I recently mentioned, just let teachers and staff be armed if they want to. (And let kids be armed as well, as long as they are trained with firearms, like in the old days.) I know, to some brainwashed sheeple, that sounds absurd. Things have changed since decades ago when that didn’t sound absurd at all, as society has further decayed and continues to decay.
And repeal all the “gun-free zone” laws!
If at least a teacher or staff member had been armed there at the school, he or she could have taken out the shooter early on, saving many lives! WHY don’t the so-called “conservative” talk radio personalities mention that? But no, they are obsessed with their love, the police, and they love the police state as well.
And the Democrats and leftists really just want to disarm law-abiding citizens and make them defenseless. They are a part of some sort of demonic, satanic cult, I am now convinced of that.
The Democrats and leftists side with criminals, we know that’s the case. They get rid of bail and let arrested violent thugs go right back out to hurt more people. They have bail funds like Kommie-la Harris did with the 2020 rioters, arsonists, looters and thugs. And contrary to their grandstanding, Democrats and leftists do not want to protect children. We know that as a fact in their not just pro-abortion fanaticism, but pro-“abortion” after the baby is born. They are pro-aggression, they don’t want people to defend themselves against aggressors, they believe in violence, they want civilians to be disarmed, unarmed and defenseless, and they want only military and police to have guns. How did that work out for the Jews in Germany? And for people in Mao’s China? Hmmm.